Most disciples are familiar with this statement without taking time to reflect on it. As you may know, salt had a duel function is ancient (and some modern) cultures: it served as a preservative and as a flavor enhancer.
Much of our food has chemical elements in them that, along with the presence of bacteria, causes them to become harmful fairly quickly. Ancient peoples discovered that when they rubbed salt onto meat it kept it from going bad. Scientists now know that salt creates an environment that removes the surroundings needed for bacteria to live and reproduce. Meats are still preserved with salt today. The salt does not change the nature of the meat. It still has a tendency to rot if left alone. Salt just blocks the effects of bacteria.
Salt also serves as a flavor enhancer. A few grains of salt not only adds a salty flavor, it also seems to make some fruit sweeter and mask unpleasant bitter tastes. As a matter of fact, salt contributes to better health if taken in moderation. Salt plays an important role in moving water around in the human body. Human beings need a proper balance of water to survive. So salt provides flavor in a life-giving way. Once again, salt does not change the nature of the food; it just enhances its flavor and its potential benefits.
So it's amazing to read that Jesus described us as "the salt of the earth." It would seem that the earth has a natural tendency to become rotten. It's not flavorful or healthful on it's own. It needs an element added to it, rubbed into it. An element that is external to it but one that has the ability to bring very positive results.
There's no question that human societies and cultures tend to "go to seed" over time. There is nothing inherently healthy in human institutions organized independently of God. If they are to survive, if they are to offer any positive benefits over time, they need to be regularly salted.
Time and time again we have seen examples of a society beginning to lose it moral center and spin into a pattern of self-destruction. The only thing that prevented its final demise was a supernatural visitation from heaven upon the church. And when the church was sufficiently revived, it had the effect of salt on the surrounding culture.
There is an excellent example in American history that church historian refer to as "the Great Revival" or "the Second Great Awakening." A variety of historians and church leaders have noted the spiritual condition of the new United States of America after the revolution. Here's what one leader wrote: "The effects of the Great Awakening of 1735 had worn off. The seeds of infidelity, imported from revolutionary France and watered by such men as Thomas Paine, were yielding their poisonous fruit. Eastern colleges were rife with the skepticism of the age. Lawlessness ruled on the western frontier. People were floundering in the bog of confusion created by the French and Indian War and the Revolution. There were few churches, few praying people. The established churches, most of whom had sided with England in the struggle for independence, had lost their influence." The decade of the 1790s became known as "the Egyptian Darkness," a result in part of "the French Infidelity."
Evidently the corrupt state of society was particularly pronounced on the college campus. When Timothy Dwight became President of Yale College in 1795 he remarked that at best, 10% of the student body professed faith in Christ. One of the students at Yale, Lyman Beecher, commented: “The college church was almost extinct. Most of the students were skeptical, and rowdies were plenty. Wine and liquors were kept in many rooms; intemperance, profanity, gambling and licentiousness were common. That was the day of the infidelity of the Tom Paine school. Boys that dressed flax in the barn read Tom Paine and believed him … [M]ost of the class before me were infidels and called each other Voltaire, Rousseau, D’Alembert, etc.”
What do do? What could the church do in the midst of this corruption and potential destruction? Some of the clergy had an idea. "The ministers were agreed on one thing--a revival was desperately needed. 'What shall we do about it?' they asked themselves. The only answer: pray. They issued a `circular letter' calling on church people to pray for revival. They were specific. Let there be `public prayer and praise, accompanied with such instruction from God's Word, as might be judged proper, on every first Tuesday, of the four quarters of the year, beginning with the first Tuesday of January, 1795, at two o'clock in the afternoon . . . and so continuing form quarter to quarter, and from year to year, until, the good providence of God prospering our endeavors, we shall obtain the blessing for which we pray.' Apparently hearts were hungry, for there was an enthusiastic response. All over the country little praying bands sprang up. In the West `Covenants' were entered into by Christian people to spend a whole day each month in prayer plus a half-hour every Saturday night and every Sunday morning. Seminary students met to study the history of revivals. Church members formed `Aaron and Hur Societies' to `hold up the hands' of their ministers through intercession. Groups of young men went to their knees to pray for other young men. Parents prayed for their children's conversion. The stage was set. What happened as a result of this concerted prayer effort has gone down as the most far-reaching revival in American history."
In 1802 the revival in the church spread to Yale. President Dwight testified: “Such triumphs of grace, none whose privilege it was to witness them, had ever before seen. So sudden and so great was the change in individuals, and in the general aspect of the college, that those who had been waiting for it were filled with wonder as well as joy. And those who knew not what it meant were awe-struck and amazed. Wherever students were found in their rooms, in the chapel, in the hall, in the college-yard, in their walks about the city, the reigning impression was, “Surely God is in this place.' The salvation of the soul was the great subject of thought, of conversation, of absorbing interest; the convictions of many were pungent and overwhelming; the “peace in believing” which succeeded, was not less strongly marked.” A student later reported: “The whole college was shaken. It seemed for a time as if the whole mass of the students would press into the kingdom. It was the Lord’s doing, and marvelous in all eyes. Oh, what a blessed change! It was a glorious reformation.”
And the Great Revival salted America. In fact, historians credit the formation of a variety of "societies," including the abolition society, on the Revival.
In 2015 we are once again aggrieved at the downward spiral of morality and the overall quality of life in our nation. What to do? What is the very best way for the church to serve as salt, as a preservative and flavor enhancer, in our nation? I would suggest that Jesus would not place the blame on the rotting meat but on the fact that "the salt has lost its saltiness." What we need is a revival of salt. If the American church would position itself for another great revival, perhaps its saltiness would return, with a preserving and flavoring effect on the nation. And let there be no doubt: As Charles Finney (a leader in the Second Great Awakening) famously wrote, "A revival may be expected when Christians have a spirit of prayer for a revival."
No comments:
Post a Comment