It’s not uncommon today for churches to place a
high priority on being “culturally relevant,” without defining what that really
means. At New Community Church our #1 Core Value speaks to this priority: “We must be culturally relevant in
method without compromising the mission and message of the gospel.” So what is
cultural relevance? It begins by recognizing the importance of “culture.” Every
people group has a unique perspective, a unique set of values and customs; the
members of that group function normally and unconsciously from within that
culture. It’s impossible to be culturally relevant without being very
intentional about culture. It’s frankly hard work (but very rewarding) to learn
another perspective and gain the sensitivity to communicate and relate across a
cultural divide. At the very least, cultural relevance involves building
meaningful and compassionate bridges to other cultures. (NOTE: There is no such
thing as a “Christian” or “Kingdom” culture; culture is an aspect of human
personality. There are aspects of every culture that co-exist comfortable with
Christian faith and others that seem to contradict the faith. Claims to
represent a “Kingdom culture” is usually ways of saying, “Our culture is
superior to yours.”)
A culturally relevant church is a
“missionary church.” If you’ve ever known a missionary you’re aware of their
preparation for building cultural bridges for the sake of the Gospel. They have
to take time to learn the values and viewpoints of the people they are
preparing to go to, understanding that the values of another culture are not
inferior, they’re just different. They need to be able to see the world through
the eyes of the “other” people so they can effectively communicate the Good
News of Jesus into their world. The same is true for any local church wanting
to be culturally relevant. Building cultural bridges requires cultural
intelligence. We have to be honest about our own culture and recognize that
it’s not better, it’s just different. We have to then identify which culture we
want to build a bridge to, understanding that culture varies from region to
region, community to community, generation to generation, ethnic group to
ethnic group. In fact, economic “classes” also have unique and distinctive
cultures. If we want to “cross over” with the Gospel, we must take the time to
explore and experience the values and customs and perspectives that define each
culture.
The apostle Paul is perhaps the best example of someone
who valued cultural relevance and was willing to work hard at the communication
and relationship skills needed to accomplish his mission. Before he began his
mission Paul was the quintessential “Jew.” When writing to the Philippians he
testified, “If someone else thinks they have reasons to put
confidence in the flesh, I have more: circumcised on the
eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the
tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; in regard to the law, a Pharisee; as for
zeal, persecuting the church; as for
righteousness based on the law, faultless” (Philippians 3:4-6). He was so convinced that his
way (the way of the cultural values of Judaism) was the correct way, the right
way, the good way, the best way, he was willing to imprison and execute anyone
who posed any kind of threat to that “way of life.” Then he encountered the
risen Christ, and was challenged to see the world and all the people in it from
the perspective of Christ. “But whatever were gains to me I now consider loss
for the sake of Christ” (Philippians 3:7). His ability to see from the
viewpoint of another people and to even speak as a representative from that new
viewpoint earned him any number of enemies, those who now considered Paul a
threat to their way of life. But because Paul was on a mission with Jesus, he
was prepared to give it all up for the sake of the Gospel. He tried to explain
his position to the Corinthian believers: “Though I am free and belong to no one,
I have made myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as
possible. To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the
law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so
as to win those under the law. To those not having the law I became like one not having the law
(though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win those
not having the law. To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all
things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some. I do all this for the
sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings” (1 Corinthians 9:19-23).
Paul’s commitment included more than normal (but challenging) cross-cultural
issues and skills; he had to develop multicultural skills; in order for the
church to truly represent God’s Kingdom, there had to be room for multiple
cultures, for all the “nations.” The needed skills would take more than
cultural sensitivity and competence, they would require special wisdom and
grace from the Holy Spirit.
When a local church commits itself to cultural
diversity, the need for cultural relevance goes to a whole new level. To once
again use New Community Church as an example, our vision statement is this: “To
be a loving community of diverse people in growing relationships with God, each
other, and those who don’t know Jesus.” A commitment to “multiculturalism” for
the sake of the Gospel of the Kingdom will take compassion, patience,
commitment, and hard work. But it is all worth it when we see that, as a
result, we are having a little bit of heaven on the way to heaven. After all,
remember how the apostle John described heaven: “After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no
one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They
were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And
they cried out in a loud voice: ‘Salvation belongs to our God, who sits on the
throne, and to the Lamb’” (Revelation 7:9-10).
No comments:
Post a Comment